Introduction and Background
The
Minnesota Child Response Initiative (MCRI) is a partnership led by the Tubman
Family Alliance and consists of domestic violence programs, mental health
agencies, and the Minneapolis Police Department. The primary mission of the project is to
“break the cycle of violence and help to heal the emotional wounds that chronic
exposure to violence inflicts on children, families, and communities.” The MCRI project has been organized into
three primary components in order to facilitate this mission: intervention,
system change, and research. The system change component of the project seeks
to identify the needs that various communities have in terms of children’s
exposure to violence through community needs assessments (in the form of
surveys and focus groups) and a geo-mapping project. This report outlines the findings from the
geo-mapping in suburban Ramsey county. Analysis was limited primarily to suburban
Ramsey county because St. Paul differs so dramatically in terms of
demographics from the rest of the county.
Geo-Mapping
The
purpose of the geo-mapping project is to use GIS software to highlight areas
that appear to have high need in terms of children’s exposure to violence and
limited resources (i.e. to identify areas where there is an apparent gap
between needs and available services).
“Need” was defined across a number of factors. The 2000 census data was used to provide a
“snapshot” of each area in terms of demographics and socioeconomic
indicators. . Domestic assault counts for each city/town in
suburban Ramsey county were also obtained from the Tubman Family Alliance
which, through a previously existing process, receives information about all
reported domestic assaults in the area.. Finally, social service resources were
contacted. The agencies to be contacted
were originally obtained from the United
Way web site and the yellow pages. We then determined, based on a series of
questions asked of staff at each agency, whether they provided services for
children and of what those services consisted.
Addresses for agencies that provided some services for children and/or
some violence specific programming were then geocoded and overlaid on the
domestic assault information.
Findings
Figure
1 shows total population by precinct city/town with the number of domestic
assaults reported in 2002. Roseville and Maplewood
are the most populous areas. Maplewood had the highest number of assaults reported in
2002 (199), while there were 131 incidents reported in Roseville.
The following areas had over 100 assaults reported in 2002: New Brighton, Moundsview, Roseville,
Shoreview, Little Canada, Vadnais
Heights, and Maplewood.
Moundsview and Vadnais
Heights emerge as areas
of comparatively high need; both reported over 100 domestic assaults in 2002
and have relatively high concentrations of young children (12-13%). Figures 3-6 show the percent of the
population in each city/town made up of a given minority population. These maps are included because efforts to
meet the needs of children exposed to violence must be culturally relevant and
culturally specific. Figure 3 indicates
that American Indians make up a relatively low percentage of suburban Ramsey
county’s population in general (only .6% overall). Figure 4 shows that the
highest concentrations of Asian Americans are found in Lauderdale (11.4%) and Falcon Heights
(15.6%). Figure 5 shows the highest concentration (4.9%) of African Americans
to be in Little Canada. Lauderdale has a
comparatively high concentration of Hispanic/Latinos. (Figure
6). Overall, as can be seen on
the “pull out” boxes on each map, minority communities make up fairly small
percentages of suburban Ramsey county’s population. Generally, as can be seen in the starred
notes on each map, minority populations tend to be more concentrated in the
city of St. Paul
than in the surrounding Ramsey county suburbs.
Figure 7 shows domestic assault counts and median family incomes in suburban
Ramsey county.
The lowest median income (below $40,000) is found in Lauderdale, which
was also shown to have comparatively high concentrations of minority
populations. The red and blue near North
Oaks and Shoreview
indicate a concentration of wealth in the north central portion of suburban
Ramsey county.
Figure 8 shades the cities/towns by the percent of families with
children that have incomes below 185% of the federal poverty guideline (an
income often considered to be the cutoff for “working poor”). The highest concentrations of “working poor
or poorer” families in suburban Ramsey county are found in Lauderdale and
Falcon Heights, where nearly a quarter of the families with children have
incomes below this level. Figure 9 shows
the percent of families with children in each city/town with incomes below the
federal poverty guide. Overall, 4% of
families with children in suburban Ramsey county are
impoverished. Again, Falcon Heights
emerges as an area of comparatively high need (nearly 15% of its families live
in poverty). Figure 10 shows the percent
renter occupied by city/town in suburban Ramsey county. This measure is included because a
comparatively high concentration of residents living in rental properties is
considered to be on indicator of potential socioeconomic instability in an
area. Overall, 26.2% of all of suburban
Ramsey county’s residents live in rental
properties. The highest concentrations
of renters are found in Falcon
Heights and Lauderdale.
Finally,
Figure 11 shows the places in suburban Ramsey county shaded by the number of
domestic assaults reported to Tubman Family Alliance in 2002 overlaid with
points geocoded to represent social service agencies that serve children and/or
provide some violence specific programming (the green starts on the maps). The majority of such resources are located in
the open space on the map, which represents the city of St. Paul.
Many suburban Ramsey county residents utilize these resources.
Important Caveats
Although
we made our best efforts to obtain accurate and comprehensive information about
services in suburban Ramsey county, it should be noted
that these maps are potentially missing relevant information. For example, we were unable to obtain
consistent information about the size of the agencies, i.e. the number of
people typically served. As a result,
areas that emerge as particularly high need may in fact be served by relatively
few large agencies. Additionally, our methods for obtaining
agencies to contact were limited to published resources, such as the United Way web site
and the yellow pages. As a result, small
agencies that do provide services to children could be missing from this
picture.
Conclusion
Despite
the limitations of the resource information provided in these maps, we feel
that this geomapping project does provide a valuable starting place for
understanding and planning to meet the needs of children exposed to violence.
These maps should be used together with representatives of communities around
the county in order to inform community and city planning for this vulnerable
group of children and families.